Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Gifted Child Quarterly
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Callahan, C. M.
Right arrow Articles by Moon, T. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Sorting the Wheat from the Chaff

What Makes for Good Evidence of Effectiveness in the Literature in Gifted Education?

Carolyn M. Callahan

University of Virginia, cmc{at}virginia.edu

Tonya R. Moon

University of Virginia

To provide an overview of the specific components that must be considered when making decisions about research in the field of gifted education, the authors describe and evaluate the three types of evidence— speculative or anecdotal, theoretical, and empirical—commonly offered in the literature of the field. Empirical, or evidence-based, research can be quantitative or qualitative (or mixed methods); it also can be interventional or non-interventional. An explanation and example of each type of empirical evidence are provided, along with key guidelines for reviewing and judging each one. Next, the authors offer general considerations for evaluating specific components of research, regardless of the type of study (e.g., source of evidence, research design, research questions, effect size, sample, instrumentation). Considerations for judging meta-analyses are also offered.

Key Words: research quality • meta-analyses • judging evidence

References

  • Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavior sciences. New York: Academic Press .
  • Fielding, N., & Fielding, J. (1986). Linking data. Beverly Hills , CA: Sage .
  • Glass, G.V. (1976). Primary, secondary, and meta-analysis of research . Educational Researcher, 5, 3-8 .[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Glass. G. V., McGaw, B., & Smith, M.L. (1981). Meta-analysis in social research. Beverly Hills , CA: Sage .
  • Hunter, J.E., & Schmidt, F.L. (1990). Methods of meta-analysis: Correcting error and bias in research findings. Newbury Park, CA: Sage .
  • Hunter, J.E., Schmidt, F.L., & Jackson, G.B. (1982). Meta-analysis: Cumulating research findings across studies. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage .
  • Kulik, C.L.C., & Kulik, J.A. (1982). Effects of ability grouping on secondary school students: A meta-analysis of evaluation findings . American Educational Research Journal, 19, 415-428 .[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • Lincoln, Y.S., & Guba, E.G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: Sage .
  • Miles, M.B., & Huberman, A.M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded source book. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage .
  • Rosenthal, R. (1984). Meta-analytic procedures for social research. Newbury Park , CA: Sage .
  • Rosenthal, R., & Rubin, D.B. (1982). A simple, general purpose display of magnitude of experimental effect . Journal of Educational Psychology, 74, 166-169 .[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Shadish, W.R., Cook, T.D., & Campbell, D.T. (2002). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. New York: Houghton Mifflin .
  • Starko, A.J. (2001). Creativity in the classroom: Schools of curious delight (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum .

Gifted Child Quarterly, Vol. 51, No. 4, 305-319 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/0016986207306317


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Callahan, C. M.
Right arrow Articles by Moon, T. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?