This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Adams-Byers, J. Articles by Moon, S. M. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Gifted Students’ Perceptions of the Academic and Social/Emotional Effects of Homogeneous and Heterogeneous Grouping

Gifted Education Resource Institute, Purdue University

Sara Squiller Whitsell

Gifted Education Resource Institute, Purdue University

Sidney M. Moon

Gifted Education Resource Institute, Purdue University

This study investigated student perceptions of differences in academic and social effects that occur when gifted and talented youth are grouped homogeneously (i.e., in special classes for gifted students) as contrasted with heterogeneously (i.e., in classes with many ability levels represented). Forty-four students in grades 5-11 completed interviews or questionnaires while attending a summer residential program for gifted and talented students. Questions were designed to clarify the nature of academic and social outcomes under the two grouping conditions. On the whole, the participants perceived homogenous grouping more positively with respect to academic outcomes. They learned more in the more challenging environment provided by homogeneous classes. However, they had mixed feelings about which setting better met their social needs. Participants seemed to value having both similar peers in homogenous classes and the social diversity of heterogeneous classes. A troubling finding that emerged was the preference of a few of the students for heterogeneous classes because they were easier and enabled them to attain a high class ranking with little work. Implications of the findings for educators and counselors of gifted students are discussed.

Gifted Child Quarterly, Vol. 48, No. 1, 7-20 (2004)
DOI: 10.1177/001698620404800102


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. Peterson, N. Duncan, and K. Canady A Longitudinal Study of Negative Life Events, Stress, and School Experiences of Gifted Youth Gifted Child Quarterly, January 1, 2009; 53(1): 34 - 49. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. Neihart The Socioaffective Impact of Acceleration and Ability Grouping: Recommendations for Best Practice Gifted Child Quarterly, January 1, 2007; 51(4): 330 - 341. [Abstract] [PDF]