Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Join NAGC today!

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Gifted Child Quarterly
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by McCoach, D. B.
Right arrow Articles by Siegle, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Factors That Differentiate Underachieving Gifted Students From High-Achieving Gifted Students

D. Betsy McCoach

University of Connecticut

Del Siegle

University of Connecticut

The purpose of this study was to examine whether gifted achievers and gifted underachievers differ in their general academic self-perceptions, attitudes toward school, attitudes toward teachers, motivation and self-regulation, and goal valuation. The sample consisted of 56 gifted underachievers and 122 gifted achievers from 28 high schools nationwide. Gifted achievers and gifted underachievers differed in their attitudes toward school, attitudes toward teachers, motivation/self-regulation, and goal valuation, but not their academic self-perceptions. In addition, the logistic regression analysis correctly classified over 81% of the sample as either gifted achievers or gifted underachievers using their motivation/self-regulation and goal valuation self-ratings. This study represents an important step toward quantifying factors related to the underachieviement of gifted adolescents.

Gifted Child Quarterly, Vol. 47, No. 2, 144-154 (2003)
DOI: 10.1177/001698620304700205


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Psychoeducational AssessmentHome page
S. M. Suldo, E. J. Shaffer, and E. Shaunessy
An Independent Investigation of the Validity of the School Attitude Assessment Survey--Revised
Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, March 1, 2008; 26(1): 69 - 82.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Psychoeducational AssessmentHome page
G. T. Henry, A. J. Mashburn, and T. Konold
Developing and Evaluating a Measure of Young Children's Attitudes Toward School and Learning
Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, September 1, 2007; 25(3): 271 - 284.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Gifted Child QuarterlyHome page
M. S. Matthews and M. T. McBee
School Factors and the Underachievement of Gifted Students in a Talent Search Summer Program
Gifted Child Quarterly, April 1, 2007; 51(2): 167 - 181.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Gifted Child QuarterlyHome page
A. W. Gottfried, C. R. Cook, A. E. Gottfried, and P. E. Morris
Educational Characteristics of Adolescents With Gifted Academic Intrinsic Motivation: A Longitudinal Investigation From School Entry Through Early Adulthood
Gifted Child Quarterly, April 1, 2005; 49(2): 172 - 186.
[Abstract] [PDF]