Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Join NAGC today!

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Gifted Child Quarterly
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (8)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hansen, J. B.
Right arrow Articles by Feldhusen, J. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Comparison of Trained and Untrained Teachers of Gifted Students

Jan B. Hansen

Purdue University

John F. Feldhusen

Purdue University

Leaders in the field of gifted education have presented models for both instructional programs for gifted students and correlated teacher training, but research on or evaluation of the effects of these training models is meager. This study showed that teachers trained in gifted education demonstrated greater teaching skills and developed more positive class climates than did teachers who had no training in gifted education. Students of GT trained teachers reported greater emphasis on higher level thinking skills and on discussion, and less emphasis on lecture and grades than did students of untrained teachers.

Gifted Child Quarterly, Vol. 38, No. 3, 115-121 (1994)
DOI: 10.1177/001698629403800304
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Gifted Child QuarterlyHome page
E. Shaunessy
Implications for Gifted Education
Gifted Child Quarterly, April 1, 2007; 51(2): 119 - 135.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Gifted Child QuarterlyHome page
J. VanTassel-Baska and S. K. Johnsen
Teacher Education Standards for the Field of Gifted Education: A Vision of Coherence for Personnel Preparation in the 21st Century
Gifted Child Quarterly, April 1, 2007; 51(2): 182 - 205.
[PDF]

Home page
 Gifted Child QuarterlyHome page
C. A. Little, A. X. Feng, J. VanTassel-Baska, K. B. Rogers, and L. D. Avery
A Study of Curriculum Effectiveness in Social Studies
Gifted Child Quarterly, January 1, 2007; 51(3): 272 - 284.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Gifted Child QuarterlyHome page
K. B. Rogers
Lessons Learned About Educating the Gifted and Talented: A Synthesis of the Research on Educational Practice
Gifted Child Quarterly, January 1, 2007; 51(4): 382 - 396.
[Abstract] [PDF]