Gifted Child Quarterly

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

2008 Annual Conference - click here for more information

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (10)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Feldhusen, J. F.
Right arrow Articles by Moon, S. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Gifted Child Quarterly, Vol. 36, No. 2, 63-67 (1992)
DOI: 10.1177/001698629203600202

Grouping Gifted Students: Issues and Concerns

John F. Feldhusen

Purdue University

Sidney M. Moon

Purdue University

Gifted and talented students need instruction at a level and pace as well as conceptual complexity commensurate with their advanced levels of ability and achievement. Grouping heterogeneously and providing cooperative learning in heterogeneous groups leads to lowered achievement and motivation as well as poorer attitudes toward school. Academic achievement of American youth is lower than the achievement of youth in many Asian and European countries. If we wish to sustain or increase the academic achievement of American youth they should be grouped for instruction according to ability and achievement levels, but grouping practices should be flexible, and rigid tracking should be avoided.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am Educ Res JHome page
R. J. Stevens and R. E. Slavin
The Cooperative Elementary School: Effects on Students' Achievement, Attitudes, and Social Relations
American Educational Research Journal, January 1, 1995; 32(2): 321 - 351.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Gifted Child QuarterlyHome page
S. M. Moon, J. F. Feldhusen, and D. R. Dillon
Long-Term Effects of an Enrichment Program Based on the Purdue Three-Stage Model
Gifted Child Quarterly, January 1, 1994; 38(1): 38 - 48.
[PDF]