Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Gifted Child Quarterly
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (7)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Borland, J. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Postpositivist Inquiry: Implications of the "New Philosophy of Science" for the Field of the Education of the Gifted

James H. Borland

Teachers College, Columbia University

In this paper I sketch the outlines of an emerging postpositivist paradigm for inquiry and research. This new paradigm is the product of recent thinking in philosophy, the natural sciences, and the social sciences—the so-called "new philosophy of science" (Phillips, 1987)— and has been embraced primarily, but not exclusively, by investigators using qualitative methods. Drawing heavily upon the work of Lincoln and Guba (Lincoln & Guba, 1985; Guba & Lincoln, 1989), I delineate the axioms (basic beliefs) underlying this approach and then consider the methodological implications that follow logically from the axioms. Finally, I suggest some applications of postpositivist inquiry in the field of the education of the gifted.

Gifted Child Quarterly, Vol. 34, No. 4, 161-167 (1990)
DOI: 10.1177/001698629003400406


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Gifted Child QuarterlyHome page
R. A. Schultz
Understanding Giftedness and Underachievement: At the Edge of Possibility
Gifted Child Quarterly, July 1, 2002; 46(3): 193 - 208.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Gifted Child QuarterlyHome page
J. H. Borland, R. Schnur, and L. Wright
Economically Disadvantaged Students in a School for the Academically Gifted: A Postpositivist Inquiry into Individual and Family Adjustment
Gifted Child Quarterly, January 1, 2000; 44(1): 13 - 32.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Gifted Child QuarterlyHome page
B. A. Grant and M. M. Piechowski
Theories and the Good: Toward Child-Centered Gifted Education
Gifted Child Quarterly, January 1, 1999; 43(1): 4 - 12.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Gifted Child QuarterlyHome page
S. M. Moon, J. F. Feldhusen, and D. R. Dillon
Long-Term Effects of an Enrichment Program Based on the Purdue Three-Stage Model
Gifted Child Quarterly, January 1, 1994; 38(1): 38 - 48.
[PDF]